<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Amy Adele Hasinoff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amyhasinoff.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amyhasinoff.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Legislation falsely claims to &#8220;decriminalize&#8221; teen sexting by Amy Hasinoff</title>
		<link>http://amyhasinoff.wordpress.com/2009/07/23/legislation-falsely-claims-to-decriminalize-teen-sexting/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Hasinoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amyhasinoff.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-14</guid>
		<description>thanks so much for posting this, I have been looking for law reviews on sexting, and so far only found Leary. thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks so much for posting this, I have been looking for law reviews on sexting, and so far only found Leary. thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Legislation falsely claims to &#8220;decriminalize&#8221; teen sexting by John Humbach</title>
		<link>http://amyhasinoff.wordpress.com/2009/07/23/legislation-falsely-claims-to-decriminalize-teen-sexting/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>John Humbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amyhasinoff.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I have just completed a law review article that closely analyzes the Supreme Court&#039;s cases on sexually explicit depictions of minors, and provides (I think) several strong legal arguments why, based on precedent, teen sexting and other self-produced images should not be prosecutable as &quot;child pornography.&quot;

The article is online at http://law.pace.edu/jhumbach/TheCensorshipofLoveMail.doc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just completed a law review article that closely analyzes the Supreme Court&#8217;s cases on sexually explicit depictions of minors, and provides (I think) several strong legal arguments why, based on precedent, teen sexting and other self-produced images should not be prosecutable as &#8220;child pornography.&#8221;</p>
<p>The article is online at <a href="http://law.pace.edu/jhumbach/TheCensorshipofLoveMail.doc" rel="nofollow">http://law.pace.edu/jhumbach/TheCensorshipofLoveMail.doc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
