• Eliminating sexting is simply not possible; adopt a harm-reduction approach instead to deal with privacy violations.
    • Understand the difference between consensual sexting and malicious privacy violations. The intent and effect of each are very different, yet many people think they are the same.
    • Consider age-neutral policies and laws, since adults can be harmed by privacy violations as much as teens can.
  • Sexting among teens, and especially young adults, is common: Klettke et al., 2014.
  • Remember that young people should be entitled to the same free speech rights as adults.

Legal Recommendations

1. Develop better laws to address privacy violations

  • Because most victims have a relationship with the person who harmed them, they will be more likely to use laws that carry weaker penalties.
  • Legal resources: McClurg, 2005, Hartzog, 2014, Eraker, 2010Nunziato, 2012.
    • Hartzog and McClurg discuss reviving “implied confidentiality” which is a productive way of understanding that personal sexual images are obviously meant to be private and that distributing them is a violation.

2. Decriminalize consensual sexting

  • Repeal all new sexting laws, or at least amend these new laws to exempt teens who produce, distribute, and possess images consensually from prosecution.
    • Example: In North Dakota, legislators created an age-neutral misdemeanor offense in 2009 for distributing or publishing “sexually expressive” images that are created surreptitiously or without consent, intended to cause “emotional harm or humiliation,” or distributed after notice has been given by the people depicted or their legal guardians that they do not consent to distribution (North Dakota century code § 12.1-27.1-03.3). The implication is that sexting is legal when it is consensual, and like rape, lack of consent to a sex act defines it as sexual assault.
  • Add close-in-age exceptions to child pornography laws, which would bring them in line with age-span exemptions for statutory rape.
  • If there is a state anti-sexting law, make sure it exempts consensual sexting among close-in-age teens. Here’s a great example of an affirmative defense from a proposed Massachusetts sexting law:
    • “It shall be an affirmative defense for any crime alleged under G.L. c. 272, § 29A, 29B, 29C, [these are the child pornography laws] or this section that (a) the image portrays no person other than the defendant; or (b) the defendant was less than nineteen, the image portrays only a teen older than fifteen and was knowingly and voluntarily created and provided to the defendant by the teen in the image, and the defendant has not provided or made available the visual depiction to another person except the child depicted who originally sent the visual depiction to the defendant.”

3. Create better tech industry regulations to help protect users’ privacy

Other Resources

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s